Happy pitching! That same reviewer gets the exact same paper from Journal B. The author can then respond to each point in turn. If the decision involves revision for the author, the specific changes that are required should be clearly stated in the decision letter and review reports. Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility, This happened recently with a few papers on toxicity of e-cigarettes, dismiss the feedback received and simply submit the unedited paper to another journal, http://andrewgelman.com/2016/09/21/what-has-happened-down-here-is-the-winds-have-changed/. If you skip addressing a specific comment, it would prevent future acceptance of the manuscript. They truly believe that it is their job to help authors publish good content. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. This is not to say that you should change course with every passing tide. Take for instance how one of the internships I had while still in college was very hands-on. If you get a reputation for using aggressive caps lock on agents who reject you, then you might get a reputation for being difficult to work with, thereby reducing your chances of getting represented by anyone. It is not uncommon for the same reviewer to get the same paper back again. The reasons for a paper being rejected once it has been reviewed fall mainly into two categories: (1) problems with the research; and (2) problems with the Answer: A 'Reject and resubmit' decision is very similar to 'Revise and resubmit. ' What are the chances of acceptance after major revision? For any changes you make, you should refer to the page and paragraph numbers in the revised manuscript (Wong, 2019). I'm just not active enough in research (I'm in a 100% clinical position w/ the VA) to know. Note that whether one of Find a new journal that matches the scope and topic of your manuscript. So the chances of rejection are likely slightly less than on the original submission. A Tale of ThreePublishers, Follow Aeryn Rudel's Rejectomancy on WordPress.com. Council of Science Editors. No, minor revision doesn't mean accepted with minor revisions. Webstudents to revise and resubmit a draft after receiving comments from the instructor. After denial, you feel extremely upset about the comments of the editors and reviewers. Look for cross-oversfrom other fields of research; for example, new methods that might be connected to old problems. There are many different reasons why a paper might be rejected during the publication process. To recover from this; try to calm yourself, stay away from that email for few days, and talk to your colleague, your mentor, or even a professional counselor about it. For journals I have managed, the number of major revision papers that are eventually accepted stays solidly between 80-90%. It is interesting to read of the journals who have moved away from Decline and Resubmit. Maybe you werent clear about something in your paper. Gut and liver, 13(1), 7. , Take time out. (LogOut/ There are many forms of peer review, from traditional models like single-blind and double-blind review to newer models, such as open and transferable review. The reasons for a paper being rejected once it has been reviewed fall mainly into two categories: (1) problems with the research; and (2) problems with the writing/presentation of the paper. What is the difference between revise and resubmit and major revision? I think it is safe to say that authors who provide a rebuttal but choose to ignore half of the comments do so at their own peril. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 107(2), 190-193. Make changes and submit to a different journal: If you decide to try a different journal, you should still carefully consider the comments you received during the first round of review, and work on improving your manuscript before submitting elsewhere. The higher-tier form rejection can be hard to recognize unless you know what youre looking for and you have a little experience with the market in question. Addressing some of the reviewers comments strengthens the manuscripts. This simple process will remove much of the personal bias that could pollute appeals letters written in rage or disappointment. Your heart sank. To submit your manuscript to a new journal, organize your manuscript according to the correct format of the new journal. So, it is important to be grateful for the time that both reviewers and editors have spent evaluating your paper and to express this gratitude in your response. After you decide to talk to your co-authors, you realize that you will be the one doing additional laboratory work and writing to address the reviewers comments. I doubt if any Editor of a peer reviewed Journal returns the manuscript of a paper with the comments Reject and Resubmit. For journals that are looking to publish top tier content, passable is not good enough. Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals, 141. I almost always get revise and resubmit, and after revision (sometimes 2-3 rounds), they have always accepted the paper. However, this is known to happen, especially as English is the language of most reputed, international journals. [CDATA[// >